Skip to main content

FCNL vigorously opposed the nomination and urged senators to speak out against his nomination and the dangerous pro-settlement, pro-occupation policies that Friedman has advocated. 

UPDATE: On March 23, David Friedman was confirmed by the Senate. The vote was 52-46, almost entirely along party lines.

UPDATE: On March 9, David Friedman squeaked out approval from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by a two vote margin. The narrow margin of the vote reflects the growing grassroots mobilization to the pro-settlement, pro-occupation policies that Mr. Friedman has promoted.

Friedman’s record of funding illegal Israeli settlements, his support for Israeli annexation of the West Bank, and his likening of supporters of the two-state solution to Nazi collaborators should disqualify him from one of the most sensitive and complex diplomatic postings in the world. 

Select Statements and Actions of David Friedman that are Cause for Concern:

  • Leading Funder of Israeli Settlement Enterprise: Friedman is the president of American Friends of Bet El Institutions, which raises millions of dollars for one of the most ideologically extreme Israeli settlements.

  • Rejects Two-State Solution/Supports Israeli Annexation [Permanent Conquest] of West Bank: Friedman described the two-state solution as “an illusory solution in search of a non-existent problem” (2-2016) and has called for taking “the entire state of Israel, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea” (9-2016) saying “we should expand a community in Judea and Samaria” (10-2015).

  • Calls Liberal Jews ‘Worse than Kapos’ [Jewish Nazi Collaborators]: Friedman said: “Are J Street supporters really as bad as kapos? The answer, actually, is no. They are far worse than kapos – Jews who turned in their fellow Jews in the Nazi death camps” (5-2016). When asked for clarification about this statement, he did not back away from this statement (12-2016).

  • Likened Consideration of Supporting Iran Deal to Nazi Appeasement: Friedman attacked Senator Chuck Schumer (NY) over his consideration of the Iran deal, writing “No matter how he ultimately votes, by making his decision such a close call—which it plainly should not be—Schumer is validating the worst appeasement of terrorism since Munich.” (8-2015)