.
Greening the U.S. Economy
 The energy debate in Washington is still hobbled by false choices: either economic recovery or a sustainable economy but not both. Now is not the time to retreat on addressing the threats of climate change. FCNL's February Washington Newsletter (PDF)looks at three aspects of this discussion.
House Fails on Cap and Trade Bill
In the end of June the House passed energy legislation that could become the basis for action on climate change this year.
We at FCNL have lobbied hard for climate change legislation, but the current bill has been so weakened by offsets, allowances to polluters, and other concessions that it may not even begin to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels for well over a decade. Find out more.
FCNL Myth Busters: Climate Bill
Take Action: See how your representative voted.
The Preferred Choice: Cap without Trade
Proposals to create a carbon cap that does not involve trading emissions permits are gaining wider support. This direct charge is a simple way to create a level playing field for low-carbon energy sources, spur investment in new clean technology, and provide a financial incentive for people to reduce their carbon consumption.
Rep. John Larson (CT) has introduced one such proposal. Does your representative support this legislation? Urge her or him to cosponsor it.
Find out more about the carbon tax in FCNL's February 2009 Washington Newsletter.
Watch this video to find out why a carbon tax makes sense. |
Can Congress Curb Climate Change?