This document has been changed since originally published to reflect new information on the ongoing appropriations process.
Budget Memo: Small Arms/Light Weapons Destruction
February 2007
Small arms and light weapons continue to kill an average of 300,000 people each year, primarily civilians. One reason why small arms are such common tools of violence for armed groups and individuals is their longevity. Small arms remain lethal for many years after manufacture and, even if sold legally, can be misused or used for unintended purposes long after the original intention of the sale has passed. Stockpiles of SA/LW left over from former wars are often poorly secured and susceptible to theft or illegal transfer, serving as a source of arms for various violent insurgent groups and criminal organizations. Arms collected in the aftermath of a peace settlement, if not quickly secured and destroyed, will often be dispersed into the community, exacerbating instability and violent crime, or fueling new conflicts. Destroying surplus, obsolete or confiscated weapons is the only way to ensure that they will not be illegally re-transferred and used to perpetrate violence in the future.
The threats posed by unsecured stockpiles of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (together referred to as WMD) are extremely serious and well known. Through Nunn-Lugar and related threat reduction programs, the U.S. government spends around $1 billion annually on programs designed to secure these weapons. Unfortunately, no similar effort exists to address the risks posed by conventional weapons. The threat of shoulder-fired missiles falling into the hands of violent extremist who use it to shoot down a commercial airliner is also very serious and very real. There may be as many as 750,000 man- portable air defense systems in arsenals worldwide. The State Department estimates that more than 40 civilian aircraft have been hit by such weapons since the 1970s. Yet, the U.S. currently spends only around $8 million annually on programs to secure excess stockpiles of these and other small arms and light weapons.
Until recently, U.S. destruction of excess SA/LW had been largely an ad hoc effort. U.S. military forces frequently destroy arms seized or otherwise collected in military or peacekeeping operations.1 Starting in 2000 the Bush administration and members of Congress realized the importance and effectiveness of these efforts and decided to design and fund a more organized program. The fiscal year 2001 foreign operations appropriations bill set up a small annual appropriation to assist countries with efforts to destroy and secure stockpiles of SA/LW. Since 2001, the budget has grown from $2 million to over $8 million annually. For FY 08, the administration requested a $44.7 million, a dramatic increase for this program. The increase represents a renewed focus on shoulder-fired anti-aircraft rocket launchers, or man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS).
Small Arms/Light Weapons Destruction
| Administration Request | House Version | Senate Version | Final | |
| FY 2004 | $2,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $3,000,000 |
| FY 2005 | $9,000,000 | $3,000,000 | $9,000,000 | $7,000,000 |
| FY 2006 | $8,750,000 | $7,000,000 | $8,750,000 | $8,750,000 |
| FY 2007 | $8,600,000 | $8,6000,000 | $8,600,000 | $8,600,000 |
| FY 2008 | $44,700,000 | $44,700,000 |
The Small Arms/Light Weapons Destruction program is administered the State Department’s Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement within the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs (www.state.gov/t/pm/wra). Some programs are coordinated with the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (www.dtra.mil). Since early 2001, U.S.-supported programs in 25 countries have resulted in approximately 900,000 SA/LW and 80 million rounds of ammunition destroyed, including over 18,600 MANPADS.2 U.S. assistance programs consist of three steps. First, a U.S. government team assesses a foreign nation's current SA/LW stockpiles. Second, military personnel in that nation are taught how to secure SA/LW and encouraged to improve the physical security and stockpile management of their small arms and light weapons. Finally, the programs aid in the destruction of surplus weapons.3
The SA/LW Destruction program is a highly effective conflict resolution tool and should be expanded. It is time to increase the budget and expand these programs to reach post-conflict areas throughout the globe. Given that destruction is relatively inexpensive (costing generally between $1-$5 per weapon destroyed) and can generally be accomplished using locally available infrastructure and personnel, the program offers large returns for a modest investment.4
February 2007
_____________________________________________________________
1. “Destroying excess small arms: United States policy and programs.” U.S. Department of State Fact Sheet. June 2, 2001. Available online at: http://www.state.gov/t/pm/rls/fs/2001/3767.htm.
2. Actions by the United States to Stem the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons. State Department Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement. June 6, 2006. Available online at: http://www.state.gov/t/pm/rls/fs/67700.htm.
3.”Small Arms/Light Weapons.” Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Available online at: http://www.dtra.mil/Toolbox/Directorates/OSI/Programs/smarms/index.cfm.
4.U.S. Department of State, 2001.



